Christian Ethics

Kenneth Cauthen


The essay that was formerly on this page has been published as a part of Chapter Eight of my Toward a New Modernism (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1997), 151-165. Copyright © 1997 by University Press of America. Some of it in a revised version was published as a part of a chapter in my The Ethics of Belief: A Bio-Historical Approach (Lima, OH: CSS Publishing Co., 2001). A few highlights are given here.

I propose that agape be thought of as mutual love that regards the self and the neighbor as equals in a community of equals, with equal rights, opportunities, responsibilities, and privileges. One who practices agape will sacrifice for the neighbor when the neighbor's need exceeds one's own or when the larger good of the community requires it but likewise will resist appropriately any trespass against the legitimate needs, claims, and interests of the self. I  refine this analysis by distinguishing between the ethical and the ecstatic dimensions of love.

The moral ideal is that each person shall have the best life possible within the constraints posed by mutual self-realization. The just and good society will seek to maximize the freedom, well-being, and equality of all citizens consistent with the appropriate limits each imposes on the others. Agape seeks a community in which all persons are regarded as equal in worth and deserving of equal consideration. An ideal community would be made up of citizens devoted to a balance between individual self-fulfillment and the advancement of the common good. It seeks a union of persons in a mutually beneficial, reciprocal relationship among free and equal members. However, inequalities of reward and responsibility may arise contextually, since people differ in ability, merit, and need. Excepting only those based on merit and natural ability, inequalities of power, wealth, and authority are legitimate only as pragmatic adjustments necessary to serve the larger and overriding ideal of a community of free and equal persons ruled by the quest of the best life possible for all. Some inequalities, then, are unavoidable, some are necessary, and some are justifiable. It is hard to improve on the principle that requires from each according to ability and gives to each according to need, while not ignoring merit. Justice and love are apposites that require, limit, and complete each other.

Kenneth Cauthen

For a more detailed exposition of this version of Christian ethics, see my Process Ethics, 125-315. See also my The Passion for Equality


I invite responses.
Please remove * in my e-mail address before sending. The * was added to thwart spammers. Thank you. Contact me at:
My E-Mail Address

This is one in a series of essays on theological and ethical topics. The best place to start is:
Theological Essays
Presently, the following essays are available:
About the Author
A List of my Books
Interpreting the Bible Today
What I Believe
The Authority of the Bible
Using the Bible with Integrity
Ways of Acquiring Moral Truth
Natural Law and Moral Relativism
What is Truth -- and Does it Matter?
A Doctrine of God
Hints Toward a Doctrine of God
Trinity: God, Christ, Spirit
God as Masculine and Feminine
Theodicy: the Problem of Evil
Theodicy: A Heterodox Alternative
The Many Faces of Evil
Christ and Christians
A Contemporary Christology
A Critique of Niebuhr's Christ and Culture
The Incompatibility of Christianity and Civilization
Christian Ethics
Process Christian Ethics
The Ethics of Belief
Relativism, Morality, Belief
Capital Punishment
Physician Assisted Suicide
Bioethical Decision-Making
Prostitution
Abortion
Drug Policy
Homosexuality
Theology and Ecology
Religion and Politics
Science and Theology
Church and State
A Short Biographical Sketch
For something on the light side:
Mother Goose Goes Electronic

Visitors since September 13, 2001:

Powered by counter.bloke.com

Created: Thursday, August 01, 1996, 1:38:52 PM
Last Updated: Thursday, November 18, 1999, 10:05 AM