Using the Bible with Integrity:

A Modernist View

Kenneth Cauthen


The essay that was formerly on this sight has been published as Chapter Two in my Toward a New Modernism (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1997), 31-43.  Some highlights of that chapter are included here.
A young candidate for ordination professing the inerrancy of Scripture came before a committee. When asked if women should keep silent in the churches (I Cor. 14:34), he said no and spent the next few minutes in a dazzling display of contextual interpretation. No matter what it says, this text means what he knew it had to in the light of his own convictions about what was was true and good..
The Polish philosopher Leszek Kolakowski set forth the Law of the Infinite Cornucopia, which notes that no shortage exists of reasons to bolster whatever theory anyone wants to believe.[1] I suggest a theological version that I will call the Law of Infinite Hermeneutical Adaptability. This law states that the Bible can be interpreted to make it compatible with nearly every conceivable doctrine. The greatest proof of the operation of this Law is that irreconcilable positions on nearly every theological and ethical question are extant, all of which claim to have the sanction of Scripture. The sublime form of the Law indicates that reasons can always be given to demonstrate that Jesus himself would have approved of the conclusions reached by a given individual or community. When the Law of Infinite Hermeneutical Adaptability is in operation, it is nearly always accompanied by the Phenomenon of Total Surprise. I prefer the description of this Phenomenon in its "Lo and Behold" form: When individuals and groups find the Word of God in the Bible, the results, lo and behold, turn out to be identical with what they themselves believe!

The modernist view is that everything in Scripture must be judged by what is most excellent in its witness, and it is we the interpreters who decide that.  Authority resides in the fact that the biblical witness evokes acceptance by our reason in the light of our experience and all the relevant evidence we can bring to bear from all sources. This provides for me the best way to use the Bible with integrity.

ENDNOTES

1. New York Review of Books (January 11, 1996), 10.


I invite evaluations, criticisms, suggestions, and other responses.
Please remove * in my e-mail address before sending. The * was added to thwart spammers. Thank you.
My E-Mail Address
This is one of a series of essays on theology and ethics. For a complete list of topics and a link to all of them see:
Theological Essays
Presently, the following essays are available:
About the Author
A List of my Books
What I Believe

Interpreting the Bible Today
The Authority of the Bible
Using the Bible with Integrity
Ways of Acquiring Moral Truth
Natural Law and Moral Relativism
What is Truth -- and Does it Matter?
A Doctrine of God
Hints Toward a Doctrine of God
Trinity: God, Christ, Spirit
God as Masculine and Feminine
Theodicy: the Problem of Evil
Theodicy: A Heterodox Alternative
The Many Faces of Evil
Christ and Christians
A Contemporary Christology
A Critique of Niebuhr's Christ and Culture
The Incompatibility of Christianity and Civilization
Christian Ethics
Process Christian Ethics
The Ethics of Belief
Relativism, Morality, Belief
Capital Punishment
Physician Assisted Suicide
Bioethical Decision-Making
Prostitution
Abortion
Drug Policy
Homosexuality
Theology and Ecology
Religion and Politics
Science and Theology
Church and State
A Short Biographical Sketch
For something on the lighter side try my rewriting of some familiar Mother Goose Rhymes.
Mother Goose Goes Electronic

Visitors since September 14, 2001:
Powered by counter.bloke.com

Created: Monday, April 01, 1996, 6:34:51 PM
Last Updated: Friday, June 15, 2001, 12:10 PM