LEAVING HOME

THE JOURNEY TO AMERICA

 

The Decision

 

The decision to migrate to the new world was not an easy one. The emigrant had to first decide if leaving home was the best option.  Parting with family, friends and familiar surroundings is not an easy decision.  Once this decision was made, he had to choose a destination and plan a route of travel.  For many, this decision was a family affair.  Advice was sought - and mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers, aunts, uncles, friends, and even entire villages freely gave help. Second information was often unreliable.  Emigrant guide books, newspaper articles, and promotional brochures and posters from states seeking settlers, brokers and agents for steamship lines selling passage, and railway companies selling transcontinental tickets all spread the good word about America as a new promised land. 

 

More widespread public education and so increasing literacy rates from the early nineteenth century onwards, can be seen as one important factor contributing to the rise in mass emigration at the time. This was due to the effect that the spread of literacy had, in greatly enhancing the power of the written word. A flood of literature relating to the New World emerged and so people¹s general knowledge of the U.S. became greatly increased. That is, people¹s misconceptions about America - in terms of its geography, economy and institution were dispelled and people in turn, were made more aware of the methods and possibilities of emigration. This spread of knowledge took several forms:

 

New cheap newspapers were printed - the reduced cost made them accessible to all and these papers carried regular immigrant features.

 

Scores of emigrant guides were produced - some were compiled by travelers and land shipping agents (whose motivation was predominantly economic) and some were produced by philanthropic and religious societies.

 

Propaganda encouraging people to emigrate in the form of adverts, posters, handbills, etc. also became increasingly widespread.

 

Throughout the nineteenth century the mechanisms of emigration became more efficient: brokers, entrepreneurs and subagents entered the traffic, manipulating increasingly professionalized propaganda.  ( www.uhb.fr/langues/cei/ )

 

 The so-called American Letters from those already in the new land were also referred to for information and advice.

 

The vast majority of letters portrayed America in a very favourable light. They spoke of the country as a land of golden opportunity with abundant lands, equal opportunities, good employment prospects and high wages. The contrast such images drew with conditions prevailing in Ireland at that time, would undoubtedly have served as even greater stimulus for potential emigrants, thus making the notion of emigration as a means of fleeing poverty and destitution an even more attractive prospect. .  (www.uhb.fr/langues/cei/ )

 

Permission                                                                          Top

 

The first official step in the process was to obtain permission to emigrate. In Ireland this was probably from the landlord.  This created many interesting scenarios.  In too many cases the emigrants evicted from the land for failing to pay their rent.  The following is from the Illustrated London News in 1848.

 

In other cases the landlord, wanting to free farmland for pasture usage, actually paid for the ticket to America. And in others the landlords were seeking ways to lower their tax burden.

 

According to the Poor Law of 1838 , landlords¹ rates were assessed according to the value of their estates. They also had to pay the rates for their tenants with land worth less than £4. Landlords were asked by tax collectors to pay the rates even if their tenants could not pay their rents, a position in which thousands of tenants were during the Famine. The rates were aimed at maintaining the local workhouses where the destitute were admitted. In order to pay lower rates many landlords cleared their estates. Some of them combined eviction with Atlantic fares. It cost a landlord half as much in one year to send his tenants abroad than to keep them at home. Between 1846 and 1855 about 50,000 tenants and labourers were shipped across the Atlantic, that is to say about 10% of people evicted in that period. Among these tenants, most of them only received their fares, some got provisions as well, and very few got some Œlanding money¹.  However, landlord assistance was very low since it represented only 4% of overseas emigration.  ( www.uhb.fr/langues/cei/lpret3.htm )

 

Others simply left the land as their crops had failed and there was little sense in remaining. We know little of our Irish ancestors exact situations.  There is even a rumor about the Conway family that a landlord was murdered but we aren¹t sure if this played a major role in the decision.

 

I could not find any examples of the Irish needing permission from their parish priest although I know most emigrants asked for a blessing before

they departed.  During our trip to Ireland we visited Cobh, once called Queenstown, where many emigrants set sail.  Many Irish emigrants departed from this port.  There is a beautiful cathedral dedicated to St. Colman that was built with donations from Irish emigrants.  In return a priest from the cathedral blessed the passengers.

 

In Scandinavia permission was needed from the local pastor.  He represented the state church.  In Sweden, a flyttningsbevis was a document that every person who intended to move permanently out of the parish was obliged to obtain a standardized document from the parish pastor.  This document was needed to leave the country.   Norway had a similar system.

 

In central Europe permission was needed from local government officials.  This often took an extended period of time as state and local needs were analyzed.  The Prussian government often demanded military service from its citizens, both a hindrance and a reason to leave.  If the emigrant¹s skills were needed, permission was often difficult to obtain.  Farmers normally received permission quickly.

 

Preparation for the Trip                                                     Top

 

Preparation for the entire trip could easily take half a year or more. Immigrants had to make clothing, stock up on food, and save money to pay for the trip to port, the Atlantic voyage, travel in America¹s interior regions, and other living and settling expenses.  For example, we know that Anders Nelsen received his permission to migrate in November.  He left the village of Bjurtan the following April. 

 

It was not unusual for an entire family to work for the money for an individual family member to make the trip.  Many left home immediately after the harvest selling the surplus crops for the cash needed for the journey.  Others held auctions to sell whatever belongings and tools they could.

 

The practice of one member of a family going to America first, then saving to bring others over was common. Sometimes the father would come alone - to see if the streets really were paved with the gold of opportunity - before sending for his wife and family. Sometimes the eldest son immigrated first, and then sent for the next oldest, until the entire family was in America.  Often those who arrived first would send a prepaid ticket back home to the next family member.

 

To help in these situations principal shipping lines had hundreds of agencies in the United States, and "free-lance" ticket agents traveled through parts of Europe, moving from village to village, selling tickets.

 

The Trip to the Sea                                                             Top

 

Once these arrangements were made it was time to pack their belongs and say their final good-byes.  Few emigrating families lived in international ports where they could be transported directly to a new country. For many, simply getting to the port was the first major journey of their lives. The first part of the trip involved travel to the port.  They would travel by inland river, train, by wagon, on donkey, or even on foot. These trips were often very difficult and expensive.  They may have taken several days or even weeks to make and required the family to stay, at least temporarily, at the port city in order to recover financially or physically from the first leg of the journey.

 

Many cried but they left confidently, believing in the blessing they had received. They departed with various amounts of money, or tickets sometimes. To get some cash some labourers sold their crops and left on the same day without paying their rents. Emigrants, especially in the first years of the Famine, were rushing to the ports. And because of the panic caused by the Famine, traditions such as the emigrant wake were abandoned.

 

To reach the port many families walked and often used a handcart. They loaded belongings on to the handcart along with the youngest children while the other members of the family walked alongside. The journey was more difficult for the poor living far from a port whereas wealthy emigrants used a cart or traveled by train. To get as far as an Irish port, emigrants had to survive. The poorest had to avoid death from starvation and most emigrants had to avoid death from disease which were spreading dramatically. Leaving home was demoralising so the obstacle was actually also of a psychological kind.  www.uhb.fr/langues/cei/lpret3.htm

 

Many of our ancestors lived inland and thus were forced to make this initial difficult journey to the sea.  Several of our Norwegian ancestors (Bjornas, Eliaason, Kinns, and Erickson) lived in mountain valleys and could follow these to the sea.  Those Norwegian families that lived in mountainous terrain probably had the most difficult journeys.  This list would include the Lee, Evenson, Hagen, and Knutson ancestors.  The area where they were from is very rugged and travel in the mid-1800s was extremely challenging.  Weeks, not days, were probably needed

 

Exceptions include the Fretheims, Dales, and Hanehaugs who all lived on the Songeford.  The first step of their journey was probably by local water travel to Bergen.  The Conways and Cullitons lived within a half days walk to the port of New Ross. The O Rourkes could have used the Shannon River. The Finleys lived in Dublin itself so very little travel was required.  Other Irish ancestors lived within 2-3 days travel from the nearest ports.

 

The terrain in north central Europe is relatively flat so our relatives from that area probably experienced little difficulty reaching the sea.  Even the Sutters lived in the foothill region of Switzerland where a rolling terrain provided only a moderate challenge.  They left from the port of Le Harve in France so most of their journey took place in that country.

 

The following is a quote from a website I visited; it would apply to Anders Nelson.

 

From Varmland province in mid-western Sweden people usually walked or went by horse and carriage across the Norwegian border and then to Kristiania (today named Oslo) the capital of Norway.  From the parishes in SW Varmland people often walked to the Norwegian town of Mysen (about 35 kilometres from the border) where they in the late 19th century could take the train down to Kristiania / Oslo. Since Norway was in a state union with Sweden 1814 - 1905 no emigration papers were needed at that border crossing.     ( www.rootsweb.com/~swewgw/Emigr/thEmiTrav )

 

At Port                                                                               Top

 

Once at port the emigrants were often forced to play a waiting game.  Sometimes these travelers would have to wait days, weeks, and even months either for their paperwork to be completed or for their ship to arrive. The travelers were harassed by hordes of land based pirates, swindlers selling counterfeit tickets and unscrupulous agents selling passage on ships that were barely seaworthy. High pressure jobbers would buttonhole emigrants and take them to disreputable inns or other places where they could be fleeced by a lively assortment of thugs, prostitutes and thieves.

 

Once at port the emigrants were often forced to play a waiting game.  Sometimes these travelers would have to wait days, weeks, and even months either for their paperwork to be completed or for their ship to arrive. The travelers were harassed by hordes of land based pirates, swindlers selling counterfeit tickets and unscrupulous agents selling passage on ships that were barely seaworthy. High pressure jobbers would buttonhole emigrants and take them to disreputable inns or other places where they could be fleeced by a lively assortment of thugs, prostitutes and thieves.

 

Most of our ancestors came to America on wooden sailing ships.  Although it was used as early as the 1830s, steamship travel was not common until the 1870s.  Departure dates for these sailing vessels depended on weather conditions and were never firm. Some provision was usually made for the care of the emigrants who were forced to wait for the ship. In some cases emigrants often would be forced to stay in the port city until some family members worked long enough to obtain additional funds to purchase tickets and supplies.  In other cases the emigrants boarded the ship and then sat in the harbor until the proper time for setting sail.

.

During the later stages of this mass immigration movement the immigrants were often faced with a series of examinations before they board ship.  These included medical exams and questions, mental and emotional states of mind, examination of financial affairs, etc. The following was taken from the Illustrated London News in 1850:

 

By the terms of the New Passenger Act, 12 & 13 Vict., c.33, no passenger-ship is allowed to proceed until a medical practitioner appointed by the emigration office of the port shall have inspected the medicine-chest and passengers, and certified that the medicines etc are sufficient, and that the passengers are free from contagious disease. The master, owner, or charterer of the ship is bound to pay the medical inspector the sum of 1 sterling for every 100 persons thus inspected. When the emigrant and his  family have undergone this process, their passage-ticket is stamped, and they have nothing further to do, until they go on board, but to make their own private arrangements and provide themselves with outfits, or with such articles of luxury or necessity as they may desire over and above the ships allowance.

 

All persons who may be discovered to be affected with any infectious disease, either at the original port of embarkation or at any port in the United Kingdom into which the vessel may subsequently put, are to be re-landed, with those members of their families, if any, who may be dependent upon them,  or unwilling to be separated from them, together with their clothes and effects. Passengers re-landed are entitled to receive back their passage-money, which may be recovered from the party to whom  it was paid, or from the owner, charterer, or master of the ship, by summary process, before two or more justices of the peace. http://vassun.vassar.edu/~sttaylor/FAMINE/ILN/Tide/Tide.html

 

The importance of Liverpool must be mentioned.  It was the major seaport for immigration during this time period (1845­1875).  Many of our Irish ancestors first sailed to Liverpool before departing for America.  For some this meant disembarking, finding food and lodging for several days, and changing ships.  Many of our Scandinavian ancestors also passed through Liverpool.  They first crossed the North Sea to Hull, England, traveled across the island nation, and then departed once again for America. 

 

From what I have read, the stay in Liverpool was memorable.

 

Š another dreadful experience awaited those disoriented Irish arriving in Liverpool in order to get passage to America. Indeed the arrival in Liverpool did not guarantee the next leg of the journey, that is to say certify their ability to get on board a ship for America. Some of the inhabitants of Liverpool were reputed for tricking the Irish out of their passage money or even seducing women emigrants to the brothels so that, during the Famine period, many rural emigrants never escaped the slums of Liverpool. The Irish now had to survive the streetwise con-men and racketeers. The emigrant was Œplundered¹ at every stage and every step from the very moment he landed. Before getting on board emigrants had to deal with ship-brokers, runners, boarding-house keepers who overcharged them, keepers of spirit vaults and provision stores who sold them bad food and drink at high prices.

                                                                                                  www.uhb.fr/langues/cei/lpret3.htm

 

Perhaps the worst experience was with the runners.

 

Runners were waiting for emigrants to land on dock. They watched steamboats arrive and made the most of the confusion to snatch up their luggage and carry it away. They really did what they wanted to emigrants:

 

"they pull them by the collar, take them by their arms, and, generally speaking, the runners who are successful enough to lay hold of the boxes are pretty sure of carrying the passengers with them."

 

They were also called man-catchers.  They fleeced the emigrants with every shape and form.

 

There were about four hundred runners and one set of runners called the Forty Thieves asked enormous amounts of money for carrying luggage they snatched up. In fact, the man-catchers were principally Irishmen themselves who had arrived earlier. They knew both the strengths and weaknesses of the Irish character. Moreover, the Irish emigrants were more easily squeezable when the man-catcher was an Irishman. They could not imagine that a fellow countryman could mean them any harm.

 

Runners also persuaded the emigrants to change their English sovereigns into dollars at a very low rate, thus giving them a very bad deal. They were in league with provision merchants who allowed them 15% on anything bought by an emigrant they dragged in. They also got a percentage from clothes merchants. Emigrants were sold bad quality products and unnecessary objects. Runners often ran spirit vaults or food shops as well but they also made a lot of money with passenger brokers who were forced to give runners a 7.5% commission for each passenger who came along with them.                                                                               www.uhb.fr/langues/cei/lpret3.htm

 

As for the exact ports where our ancestors set sail we have very little definitive information.  The only port we can make positive association for is the Sutters leaving from Le Harve in France and the Fretheims sailing from Bergen in Norway.  Other than that it is simple speculation. 

 

Tickets                                                                               Top

 

The cost of the transatlantic fare varied from ship to ship and depended on the time of year, available accommodations, and price competition among ships. In researching this topic many different figures were found.  Keep in mind that most fares were paid in the local currency.  Transforming this into American dollars creates problems.  However, after several comparisons I have estimated that the price range would probably be $10.00 - $25.00 per adult. Using an inflation calculator found on the internet we can estimate that would be between $200 - $500 today.

 

In fact, during the Famine period, the cost of steerage passage varied from £2 to £5 (£40 to £100 today) according to the port of arrival. The greatest drop came from Irish ports where during the 1820s, with the British Passenger Acts favouring migration to Canada rather than to the United States, passage to Quebec could be obtained for as little as thirty shillings (there were twenty shillings to the pound), which was one tenth of the rate in the 1810s. In Cork in 1846, steerage passages to Canada ranged from 50 to 60 shillings and from 70 shillings to £5 to the United States. After 1847 the rates were standardised to about 65 shillings to Canadian ports and 75 shillings to New York. In Liverpool, the cost of steerage passage to New York fell from £12 in 1816 to just £3, 10s. in 1846.

 

Fares varied from day to day, sometimes changing by the hour. The variation in some fares depended on the season. It was sometimes more expensive in winter because conditions were more difficult than during the summer. It also depended on the comfort of the ships rather than the accommodations on board. For a Liverpool-New York crossing, berth in steerage varied between £3, 10s and £5 (US $17.5 to $25). Sometimes one could also get a cabin. They were much more expensive (£12 to £15) mainly because they were few and far between. They were usually only available on packet ships which regularly crossed the Atlantic.  www.uhb.fr/langues/cei/lpret3.htm

 

A large percentage of emigrants traveled when they were either single or without children. Very young children sometimes traveled at no cost, but the cost for older children was often two-thirds an adult fare. In addition to this cost, emigrants had to pay for transportation to reach the ports, lodging along the way, and lodging at the port city. They also had to equip themselves with bedding, cooking supplies, and other travel essentials.

 

The following is from an excellent website on Norwegian emigration.  Note, at that time 20 speciedaler was equal to $22.00 American dollars, approximately $450.00 today.

 

The cost of passage with a sail ship could vary Š. Captain Johan Gasmann of the Salvator made up the following list of expenses an emigrant could expect to pay:

 

The journey from Norway to Quebec: 20 speciedaler

Landing fee in New York: $1.75

Transportation from New York to the interior: $9.00

Food for 12 to 14 days: $5.00

 

Passenger traffic was lucrative business for the shipping companies. Many ship owners turned the other way regarding a safe number of passengers. The more passengers,, the greater the profit.

 

The passengers traveling by sail had to bring their own food. This was often stored in a hold beneath the between-deck, and each day the passengers had to go down to fetch provisions. On the emigrant vessel Laurvig , baggage was piled on top of other cargo. Sometimes it was difficult for the passengers to get to their provisions, especially if there was little space in the cargo hold. On some ships there was space for trunks and other loose equipment in the center aisle, but this could, of course, be dangerous in bad weather. There are accounts about passengers who were injured by goods that slid back and forth on the deck. On the Atlanta in 1871, it was said that food chests and kegs with milk and beer were tied down in the center aisle. The ship was hit by a storm and all the passengers lay in their bunks holding themselves fast. A man from Rennesø had taken a keg of beer into the bunk with him, but the waves hurled the keg out of the bunk onto the deck. The man jumped out after it, and in an attempt to save it, rode the keg back and forth across the deck. This resulted in the ropes holding the items in the center aisle working their way loose, and soon

 

everything was rolling from side to side in keeping with the waves. Fortunately, the man managed to get himself and the keg of beer back into the bunk before he was seriously injured. In spite of the seriousness of the situation, everyone had a good laugh. The most common food was cured mutton and other salted or dried food. Flatbread was almost always brought along. Also customary were sour milk and beer in kegs. In addition they had dairy products with them such as butter and soft whey cheese. They also had raw materials with them so they could cook porridge on board. It was important that the provisions could be stored for the duration of the journey.

 

The following is a list of provisions printed by Det Norske Udvandringsselskap in Christiania (later Oslo) in the 1870s. These provisions were intended to be adequate for an adult for up to ten weeks:

 

- 70 pounds hard bread (or the equivalent in soft bread or flatbread)

- 8 pounds butter

- 24 pounds meat

- 10 pounds side pork

- 1 small keg of herring

- 8/3 Td. potatoes

- 20 pounds rye and barley flour

- 1/2 bushel dried peas

- bushel pearl barley

- 3 pounds coffee

- 3 pounds sugar

- 2 pounds syrup

- Quantities of salt, pepper, vinegar and onions

 

Of course, each passenger may take along the type of provisions desired as long as they are adequate for 10 weeks.

 

The emigrants were also advised to take along equipment, such as a water pail, (the size according to the needs of each family, about 3 quarts a day per person) cooking pot, coffee kettle and dishes and eating utensils.

                                                                                               http://www.norwayheritage.com/

 

 

The following list describes the actual contents a couple brought along in 1869 in their Rosemaled Chest.                           http://www.norwayheritage.com/

 

Kjue-kjue leivar flat brø. (400)

76 pund smør. (butter)

Tolv saua. (twelve legs of mutton)

1 tønne kavring (cask of hardtack)

2 tønne nøteknekker (crackers)

1 anker brennevin (cask of brandy)

2 kvart rom (quarts of rum)

1 kvart mjø (mead)

1 anker sur melk (sour milk)

8 gallon primost (cheese)

 

1860 Passenger Contract Ticket

J.& J. Cooke, Londonderry        http://www.theshipslist.com/ships/Arrivals/passengercontract.htm

 

3 quarts Water daily, exclusive of what is |necessary for Cooking the Articles required by the Passenger Act to be issued in a Cooked State;

 

and a weekly allowance of Provisions according to the following scale:-

 

3 1/2 lbs. Bread or Biscuit, not inferior in quality to Navy Biscuit.

2 1/2 lbs Flour,

3 1/2 lbs Oatmeal,

2 lbs Potatoes,

1 1/2 lbs Beef,

1lb Pork,

2 oz Tea,

1 lb Sugar,

2 ozs Salt,

1/2 oz Mustard,            

1/4 oz. Pepper,

1 Gill Vinegar.

 

N.B. - The Passengers have only to provide Beds, Bedding, and Mess Utensils.

 

Boarding the Ship                                                                                            Top

 

Finally the time came for embarkation and departure.  The following is taken from a website describing Irish immigration.

 

Most emigrant vessels departed from the Waterloo Dock and passengers were entitled to board the ship twenty-four hours before departure. Many saw a great advantage in settling on the ship before leaving because meanwhile they did not have to deal with runners. Sometimes, whilst waiting for departure, when they were lucky to have a fiddler or a piper among them, the passengers sang and danced. This was common on emigrant packets. However, captains of other kinds of ships such as cargo ships, often did not allow the passengers to board until the last minute, when the cargo had finally been stowed in the hold. In fact, the captain often started to move his vessel before emigrants had time to get on board. When the captain was doing so or when the passengers arrived too late (which was quite common), that is to say after the gangplank was raised, then they went to the dock-gate.

 

The entrance of the dock was narrow and ships were detained there for a short time while other vessels were going out. During that time men, women and children were scrambling up the sides of the ship. One could see hundreds of people confused, screaming. Luggage and boxes were flung aboard, followed by the passengers. When they or their luggage missed the ship and fell into the water there was usually a man in a rowing boat ready to rescue and get his reward. But sadly there was not always someone there to rescue and consequently a few people drowned. Those who did not manage to get on board at the dock-gate had no choice but to hire a rowing boat to catch up the ship down the river Mersey. The boatmen would not do it for less than half a sovereign. Getting on board a ship was really rough, even for the cabin passengers. Vere Foster, the philanthropist, complained about the way the embarkation was carried out and wrote about his own experience:

 

"Men and women were pulled in any side or end foremost, like so many bundles. I was getting myself in as quickly and dextrously as I could, when I was laid hold of by the legs and pulled in, falling head foremost down upon the deck, and the next man was pulled down upon the top of me".

 

Undoubtedly, on ships other than packet ships, the embarkation was often made in a hurry and in frightening conditions. Embarkation was therefore yet another obstacle but certainly not the last one, something which most emigrants realised.

 

There were usually a large number of spectators at the dock-gates to witness the final departure of the ship. The sad scene of the departure was described in the Illustrated London News in 1850:

 

the most callous and indifferent can scarcely fail, at such a moment, to form cordial wishes for the pleasant voyage and safe arrival of the emigrants, and for their future prosperity in their new home. As the ship is towed out, hats are raised, handkerchiefs are waved, and a loud and long-continued shout of farewell is raised from the shore, and cordially responded to from the ship. It is then, if at any time, that the eyes of the emigrants begin to moisten.  

                                                                                  http://www.uhb.fr/langues/cei/lpret3.htm

 

And so, our immigrant ancestors departed the old world behind and set sail on another chapter of a new adventure.  For some the hardships of the life they left behind seem minor for what they faced in the two months ahead while crossing the Atlantic Ocean.

 

 

 

 

 

Homepage

Top

 

 

Crossing the Pond (next article)

Email me